Alexis
Soyer is described as the most famous chef in Victorian England. He wrote many
recipe books and even invented his own range of products for example his ‘magic
stove’ which was a portable table top stove. But to many he was also ‘The
people’s chef’ as he tried to reform cooking for the poor by writing recipe
books for example Soyer’s Shilling Cookery
for the People and he offered his culinary services in the Crimean war and
during the Irish potato famine in 1847. His recipe book Soyer’s Shilling Cookery for the People is a great example of
practical recipes where he shares lots of culinary advice and everyday recipes
that people with very little could benefit from. It is written in an epistolary
form between two ‘ladies of leisure’: Eloise and Hortense and the tone of the
recipe book is friendly and conversational. The purpose of this recipe book is
educating the poor on ‘making the most’ of the food they have been
provided. In the introductory letters
Eloise states the ‘happy and simple style’ of the book and the fact that only
cheap food items are mentioned allows it to be accessible for all and the ‘numerous’
recipes (473 in total) ranging from soups, pies, salads and cakes will be a
‘great blessing’ to many and thus will ‘form part of their daily diet’.
The chapter General ignorance of the
poor in cooking begins with ox cheeks which contain a ‘large amount of
nourishment’ and Soyer through the voice of Hortense criticises the poor for
they ‘completely spoiled’ this item of food. This chapter is particularly
humorous due to Hortense’s earnest desire to help the poor lady but also her
lack understanding of the poor’s way of life. Hortense visits an old lady and she asks her a
few questions on how she cooks the ox cheeks. ‘But my dear woman how long do
you cook it?’ ‘Sometimes as long as an hour… and boiling till the water will
not stand it any longer’ , ‘What do you do with the water?’ ‘Faith there is no water left only black
muck at the bottom of the pot, which I throw away’. Therefore, due to the ‘black muck’ we
immediately know that the old lady’s method is incorrect and she must be
enlightened. Hortense breaks from
this conversation and writes to Eloise: ‘Therefore I am always of the same
opinion, dearest Eloise as regards our
long talked of scheme of opening a national school to teach the poor how to
cook their food’. There is clearly a
sense of superiority over the poor’s cooking and Soyer wants to teach them to
stop butchering this delicacy! She differentiates between ‘their food’ and
describes the old lady as ‘so ignorant’ and so needs to be taught how to
‘properly’ cook an ox cheek. Despite not having enough money to buy another ox
cheek (which shows the depth of her poverty) Hortense provides one and also gives
the old lady sixpence for salt to clean the pot and for coal. The method Soyer
gives is very precise and easy to follow. Hortense states “I then produced the
ox cheek and put it into the pot with four quarts of cold water, four teaspoonful
of salt, and some leaves of celery…’ At the end of three hours I returned.’
This shows the ease of her method or really Soyer’s! Then when serving she says
‘in a large basin – put some crusts of bread’ and ‘poured the liquid from the
pot onto it’. So even after three hours of slow cooking she is left with a
considerable amount stock rather than the ‘black muck’ the old lady was left
with after just one hour of cooking.
This way is shown to be very organised, structured, and simple and makes a homely meal of ox cheeks! Hortense is even able to ‘cut the cheek easily with a very bad knife, it being so tender’ and serves ‘the soup out into cups with a beer jug, having nothing better’. So despite poor kitchen utensils this dish can still be successful whilst also showing her resourcefulness. The old lady finds it ‘very good’ and decides she will ‘show her neighbours how to do it’. This actually reminded me of the proverb ‘Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day. Teach a man to fish and you feed him for a lifetime’. So as the old lady is taught the necessary skills she and others can benefit from it. There is a student-teacher relationship which is particularly clear when she says ‘I will do them as well as you, now I have seen you do it’ and also shows the old lady’s eagerness to learn. However, it’s amusing that the old lady buys a bottle of ‘blue ruin’ (gin) with the rest of the sixpence Hortense gave her and as a token of her gratitude offers a drop of the substance to Hortense. It is a ‘strange smell’ to Hortense and it is composed of vitriol which shows it was adulterated to make it cheaper. Hortense blames the ‘emancipated looks’ of the poor on this substance and most concerningly omits gin from the rest of the recipes! This perhaps shows that it is easy to teach recipes as they are meant to be aspirational but harder to change your way of life.
The old lady is given
several more recipes but she and others are unable to read it, which shows
their desire to follow these recipes but sadly due to illiteracy it stops being
a useful resource. So one obstacle made clear is that despite being affordable,
widespread illiteracy in Victorian England could have meant this recipe book wasn’t
very successful with the poor. Hortense visits one day and when realising that
the old lady and her neighbours are unable to read the recipes she ‘begged the
others stop, and hear the receipts read which they accordingly did, afterwards
giving several copies away’. So she
quite desperately pleads for the council to hear her recipes so that they
understand them, which seems to be the effective way.
One of the lessons she gives
in this chapter is a rice dish with mixed vegetables. She is very detailed in
her instructions and very clear for example the vegetables ‘should all be cut into
dice and not peeled’ and be ‘well
cleaned’ with the exception of the onion. Alternate ingredients are also suggested to use if one ingredient isn’t
available for example instead of rice, half a pint of split peas or barley can
be used too, showing how easily adaptable it is. Helpful advice is also given
such as how to know when the meal is ready.
Another chapter is the Three-
legged iron pot which was a popular cooking pot for the poor in Victorian
England. It was very heavy so very little coal was needed to heat something and
it would retain heat to slow cook food. ‘It also had health benefits,
especially for children, because of the iron that was transferred from the pot’.
Interestingly Soyer describes the three legged iron pot as a ‘mighty monarch’ and
suggests it will be everlasting as it has withstood time, ‘war, famine,
epidemic, revolutions, which have ‘shaken foundations of mighty empires’ but
not a ‘wrinkle’ has appeared on ‘his noble brow’. So this humble item of cookware seems to be
something powerful, almighty, and almost supernatural! It’s safe to say Soyer
was a big fan of the three -legged iron pot! It does however seem quite
melodramatic as he continues ‘he is posterity himself’, ‘no throne ever has
been, or will be, stronger than his’. It
is described in masculine terms and there is anticipation as to what it is that
Soyer is praising so highly and then he tells us that it is no other than the
three- legged pot. The purpose of this pot according to Soyer was ‘to entertain’,
‘comfort’ and ‘feed’ people and ‘make them happy even when nature has almost
refused’. It is therefore associated with the home and warmth and of course happy
times and is a source of protection. One of the recipes mentioned that can be
cooked in the three- legged iron pot is salt beef which is a combination of
meat, split peas or rice and plenty of vegetables for example turnip tops,
brocoli-sprouts and green kale. In fact Soyer advices for ‘every part of salted
beef may be boiled thus, using about four ounces of vegetables to every pound
of meat’. There is a good balance of vegetables and meat both in terms of cost
and diet and turns some humble ingredients into something nourishing and
filling. 
What is interesting about this post is how you have not only given the main outline of the book, but also the attitudes that Alexis Soyer has towards the poor. I also like how you have described the food that the poor eat and used quotes from the text to emphasise your point. Overall, a very well-written and enjoyable post. :)
ReplyDelete